"Was Plessy v. Ferguson a Case of Judicial Activism?"
A Focus on the 14th Ammendment
Designed by Elizabeth Haugen, Oakland Technical School, OUSD
Michael Jackson, Media Academy, OUSD
Thea Marston, College Prep & Architecture Academy, OUSD
Teddy Varno, Dept. of History, UC Berkeley
Maryann Wolfe, Oakland Technical School, OUSD

I. OVERVIEW:

The theme for the Teaching American History Grant was the U.S. Constitution, and our Lesson Study Group decided to focus on the 14th Amendment. We settled on Plessy v. Ferguson because it is a provocative case within the context of the post-Civil War/Reconstruction Era but also because of the direct connection with Brown v. Board of Education. As AP teachers, we felt it important to choose a topic that might enable us to make connections with other events in American history, therefore, using class time in an efficient manner. We also thought this lesson could be easily adapted to the needs of non-AP classes.

In order to try the Plessy case, students had to understand

  1. the 14th amendment in its historical context.
  2. the particulars of how the court operated.
  3. judicial decision-making at the Supreme Court level and how the meaning of a constitutional amendment changes depending on who sits on the Court (in this case, how the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment was interpreted).

To assess student knowledge and understanding, students were asked to write an argumentative essay in response to the question:

Was the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson true to the 14th amendment, or were the justices asserting judicial activism?