TEACHING THE TRIANGLE OF TRADE
THROUGH MAPPING AND SIMULATION EXERCISES

III. CONCLUSIONS

BACKGROUND

This lesson was part of a larger unit on slavery in America. We were preparing students to answer a unit-ending prompt on the middle passage of the triangle of trade in which they would make use of their readings on the capture and enslavement of Olaudah Equiano.

COMMENTARY

We chose as a team to engage the students through the use of a classroom simulation. The simulation activity proved far more successful than we had anticipated. Students were actively engaged throughout the lesson, responding to the visual images of the exchange of commodities and the treatment of humans within that system.

One key component of lesson study is the actual observation of the collaboratively designed lesson. We had two distinct elements in our lesson: a mapping exercise and the simulation. After observing and debriefing, we chose to break the lesson into two separate experiences. Prior to this lesson and in preparation for the discussion on the Middle Passage and American slavery, the instructor provided the students with a brief overview of life in West Africa. This included the kidnapping of slaves by African and European slave traders and the transport of captured Africans to the West Coast of Africa.

The observed lesson focused on the triangle of trade. Adapting a map from the assigned textbook, students were led through a mapping exercise. We found that it was important to incorporate a geography review by labeling specific continents, countries, and cities. We decided this would be a good time to have students prepare the commodities posters for the next day’s simulation.

The following day’s lesson included the actual reenactment of trade. When we initially observed the simulation, we were overwhelmed with the student response. They were able to clearly understand how slavery was one aspect of an international economic endeavor that included the treatment of people as commodities. As a visual aid, the commodity posters further clarified this complex and abstract concept. The lesson also amplified for some students the colonial economic dependence and subjugation to British imperial and economic needs. At the end of the simulation, most were able to articulate the economic basis of slavery while also acknowledging the cruelty of enslaving other humans.

After debriefing the written and oral responses of the students, we decided to revise the simulation in order to ensure the active participation of all students. Because there were more students than commodities, some students had to be observers. They were assigned a new task. In the revised lesson they were required to complete feedback sheets. We also devised more explicit instructions for participants.

We followed our lessons on the triangle of trade with excerpts from the autobiography of Equiano, which discussed his kidnapping and middle passage experience. These readings would further prepare students for a formal writing assignment.

In our original culminating assessment we included both writing prompts. This prompt would be our revised culminating assessment:

How does Equiano’s writing help us understand the experience of Africans as part of the triangle of trade? How did Equiano’s autobiography help further your understanding?

Having the background on the colonial and imperial trade routes, students possessed a greater context through which to understand Equiano’s story. In the final writing assignment, despite assistance with note-taking and scaffolding, most students still had a difficult time extrapolating from Equiano to the experience of enslaved Africans.

We found that students had difficulty deciphering the vocabulary and language in historical documents. Despite teacher led note-taking, students continued to struggle with translating their notes into formal writing. Although students were able to identify specific evidence, they continued to have a difficult time with analysis. They did have an easier time finding evidence for their final writing because they had access to notes. However, too often student writing included what they anticipated the teacher wanted. In general, they were unable to draw their own conclusions. In our final debriefing, we decided that analysis needs to be regularly practiced in the classroom, recognizing that analysis is difficult for both teacher and student. Lacking an explicit plan to instruct students in analysis, we grappled with where to place emphasis and how to evaluate statements during the lesson.

One of the areas in which students were continually successful was their ability to express empathy and make connections.

Biography offers the possibility for students to visualize and empathize with the human aspect of the historical experience. They were able to tap into one person’s life story. Because they had difficulty drawing conclusions from the specific story, we decided it would be important to pull in more view points to demonstrate the complexity of historical events. We found that it remained difficult for them to generalize to the big question of “What does their experience tell us about that period in history?” Accessible biographies and autobiographies are hard to find at the fifth grade reading level. It takes time to find useful passages to share with students

We would like to extend our explicit instruction to Equiano and examine how to teach biography, so that students can transfer specific information from one individual to a shared experience or generalization about a group. One idea was to send students home to watch a family routine such as the dinner meal. The following day they would share in class. Then, students would come up with generalizations about how families take their evening meal. This exercise on specific-to-general would develop a schema for teaching Equiano’s capture and experience in the middle passage as illustrative of a shared experience.

We did not anticipate how successful the simulation would be and how explicitly we needed to direct the mapping activity. Students needed to be reminded of geographic features during the mapping. We had not anticipated all of the steps in the mapping exercise. We do believe the combination mapping and simulation would be helpful for second language learners since visual and kinesthetic cues are an integral part of the experience. In the subsequent lessons, which included the Equiano excerpts, language and vocabulary were difficult for students and required a lot of re-phrasing on the part of instructor. In conclusion, the two areas we must work on as teachers are:

  • finding resources to add multiple perspectives

  • helping students to limit their tendency to exaggeration.